Setting a country classification framework for global equity markets requires more than a focus on relative wealth.
Equity markets in FTSE’s Global Equity Index Series fall into one of four categories: developed, advanced emerging, secondary emerging and frontier. The classification process includes an initial screening of countries by their gross national income per capita, using World Bank data.
There’s clearly a correlation between development status and relative national wealth. For example, the G7 nations had average gross national income (GNI) per capita of $44,839 in 2013, based on the World Bank’s Atlas method of measuring currency values.
All of the G7 nations—the US, Japan, Canada, Germany, France, the UK and Italy—are developed countries within FTSE’s country classification framework.
By contrast, the four nations represented in the FTSE BRIC 50 index (Brazil, Russia, India and China) had mean GNI per capita of $8,420 in 2013, over five times lower than the G7 average.
All four of these countries are members of the FTSE Emerging index (Brazil is in a subcategory of advanced emerging countries and Russia, India and China are in the secondary emerging subcategory).
But it would be a mistake to assume that high levels of relative national wealth are automatically associated with developed equity market status.
For example, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have levels of national income that are comparable with or higher than those of the leading developed nations (according to the World Bank, in 2013 Qatar and UAE had GNI per capita of $85,550 and $38,620, respectively).
However, these countries’ equity markets are currently some way from being classified as developed. They currently have frontier and secondary emerging status, respectively, within FTSE’s country classification framework (although Qatar is on the watchlist for possible promotion to secondary emerging status).
This perhaps surprising result reminds us of the central purpose of the classification process: to distinguish mature economies with deep, developed capital markets from other countries with relatively underdeveloped equity markets and a less evolved infrastructure for equity trading.
According to FTSE’s assessment of quality of markets, both Gulf states’ equity markets still fail to meet a range of criteria necessary for classification either as an advanced emerging or a developed market: these include the requirement to treat minority shareholders in a fair and non-prejudicial way, to allow foreign investors to invest in local companies without significant ownership restrictions, and to have a free and well-developed foreign exchange market.
That said, FTSE was the first major index provider to include the UAE in a broad emerging markets index (in September 2010). The UAE equity market has performed well relative to the FTSE Emerging index, particularly since the beginning of 2013.
Source: FTSE, data as at June 30 2014. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
FTSE is involved in consultations with the two Gulf States’ stock exchanges and securities regulators and actively monitors the local markets’ compliance with individual quality of markets criteria, such as those concerning foreign ownership restrictions.
Countries’ relative levels of income are a good starting point for a classification of global equity markets. But to prove useful for investors, a classification process must look at a much broader range of structural features.
© 2015 London Stock Exchange Group companies.
London Stock Exchange Group companies includes FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”), Frank Russell Company (“Russell”), MTS Next Limited (“MTS”), and FTSE TMX Global Debt Capital Markets Inc (“FTSE TMX”). All rights reserved.
“FTSE®”, “Russell®”, “MTS®”, “FTSE TMX®” and “FTSE Russell” and other service marks and trademarks related to the FTSE or Russell indexes are trademarks of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and are used by FTSE, MTS, FTSE TMX and Russell under license.
All information is provided for information purposes only. Every effort is made to ensure that all information given in this publication is accurate, but no responsibility or liability can be accepted by the London Stock Exchange Group companies nor its licensors for any errors or for any loss from use of this publication.
Neither the London Stock Exchange Group companies nor any of their licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the results to be obtained from the use of the FTSE Russell Indexes or the fitness or suitability of the FTSE Russell Indexes for any particular purpose to which they might be put.
The London Stock Exchange Group companies do not provide investment advice and nothing in this communication should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice. The London Stock Exchange Group companies make no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any asset. A decision to invest in any such asset should not be made in reliance on any information herein. Indexes cannot be invested in directly. Inclusion of an asset in an index is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold that asset. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from a licensed professional.
No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the London Stock Exchange Group companies. Distribution of the London Stock Exchange Group companies’ index values and the use of their indexes to create financial products require a license with FTSE, FTSE TMX, MTS and/or Russell and/or its licensors.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index may change from month to month based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index.